Forthcoming Articles

2012, Volume 89

Preview: Prost v. Anderson and the Enigmatic Savings Clause of 2255: When is a Remedy by Motion "Inadequate or Ineffective?"
Bryan Florendo

Preview: The Federal Arbitration Act, The Preemption Doctrine, and the Impact of AT&T Mobility L.L.C. v. Concepcion 
Kristopher Kleiner

Preview: Thomas v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.: Semantics, Fiduciary Duty, and an Outdated Distinction
Jeremy Liles

Preview: Policing the Police: Protecting Civil Remedies in Cases of Retaliatory Arrest
Randolph A. Robinson II

Preview: Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. Winn: Reconsidering Flast’s Exception to the Rule Against Taxpayer Standing and Establishing the Tax Credit Distinctio
Edward R. Shaoul

Preview: Taking It All Off: Salazar v. Butterball and the Battle over Fair Compensation Under the FLSA’s “Changing Clothes” Provision
Amanda Walck

2011, Volume 88.4

Special Issue: Socioeconomic Diversity and American Legal Education

Foreword: Social Class, Race and Legal Education 
Joyce Sterling & Catherine E. Smith

Class in American Legal Education
Richard H. Sander

Reflections on Class in American Legal Education
Richard Lempert

Reflections on Richard Sander’s Class in American Legal Education
Richard D. Kahlenberg

Class Privilege in Legal Education: A Response to Sander
Deborah C. Malamud

Meeting Across the River: Why Affirmative Action Needs Race & Class Diversity
Deirdre M. Bowen, J.D., Ph.D.

An Ounce of Prevention is Worth a Pound of Cure: Reframing the Debate about Law School Affirmative Action
Daniel Kiel

Class, Classes, and Classic Race-Baiting: What’s in a Definition?
Angela Onwuachi-Willig & Amber Fricke

Race as a Red Herring? The Logical Irrelevance of the Race vs. Class Debate
Arin N. Reeves

Race and Socioeconomic Diversity in American Legal Education: A Response to Richard Sander
Danielle Holley-Walker

Commentary on Professor Richard Sander’s Class in American Legal Education
L. Darnell Weeden

The Visibility of Socioeconomic Status and Class-Based Affirmative Action: A Reply to Professor Sander
Eli Wald

Listening to the Debate on Reforming Law School Admissions Preferences
Richard H. Sander

 

Events & Announcements

Forty Years Since Keyes v. School District No. 1: Equality of Education Opportunity and the Legal Construction of Modern Metropolitan America

February 1, 2013

The Denver University Law Review is excited to announce the topic of its 2013 annual symposium: “Forty Years Since Keyes v. School District No. 1: Equality of Education Opportunity and the Legal Construction of Modern Metropolitan America.” Emanating from Denver, Colorado, Keyes was the first school-desegregation case from “a major city outside of the South” to reach the United States Supreme Court. The symposium will revisit Keyes with key participants from the case and from the court supervision of Denver’s desegregation plan. We will look back at how the city, the metropolitan area, and the state’s public school systems have evolved over the past forty years as well as consider the challenges they face today and in the future. All are welcome, and CLE credit will be available for the various panels, lectures, and workshops.  Please mark your calendar and plan to join us on February 1, 2013, at the University of Denver Sturm College of Law. Click here for more event details.

 


Volume 90 Board of Editors Announced

Denver University Law Review is excited to announce the Volume 90 Board of Editors.  Please join us in congratulating them in this accomplishment and supporting them in continuing the fine tradition of the Denver University Law Review. Please click here to view masthead.

Marijuana at the Crossroads: A Symposium

On January 27, the Denver University Law Review presented our annual symposium. This year we explored the state of medical marijuana laws today, the issues attorneys confront in practice, the constitutional issues, and the ethical issues. For more information, please click here. This event created some buzz with the local media.

Thanks to all our speakers and everyone who worked behind the scenes to help make this a successful event. 

Denver University Law Review Creating a Buzz  

Our most recent issue, Issue 88.4, on Socioeconomic Diversity and American Legal Education is already creating buzz in the legal and education community.

The ABA Journal recently highlighted Richard H. Sander's article "Class in American Legal Education," available here.

In addition, Richard Kahlenberg commented on Prof. Sander's article in The Chronicle of Higher Education blog. Click here to read Prof. Kahlenberg's article on The Chronicle of Higher Education, and here to read Profs. Sander's article and Kahlenberg's reflection. 

« Medical Marijuana and the Constitution Panel | Main | Marijuana at the Crossroads: Issues Confronted in Practice »
Friday
Feb172012

The State of Medical Marijuana Today

Betsy Proffitt[1]

Brian Vicente, founder of Vicente Sederberg, LLC, a law firm working intensively with the medical marijuana community, began the panel discussing the legal issues and solutions for medical marijuana patients and providers. Mr. Vicente explained that Colorado is one of sixteen states that allow medical marijuana, and eighteen additional states are considering passing laws this year. Although not all states will succeed in passing the laws, it demonstrates the trend occurring across the nation. Mr. Vicente compared the progress of medical marijuana to gay rights. “Our parents generation thirty years ago didn’t think gay marriage was possible and now several states allow it. Anyone under 35 thinks it isn’t a big deal.”

Recently, the U.S. attorney mailed letters to dispensaries within 1,000 feet of schools. Mr. Vicente said the letters informed dispensary owners, or in some cases their landlords, that they have forty-five days to shut down or they will be prosecuted criminally or potentially civilly. These letters are the first federal pushback Colorado has experienced since allowing medical marijuana, and more letters are expected. The request is harming dispensaries in Boulder especially where school zones comprise most of the city.

Mr. Vicente also discussed the politics surrounding this issue. “70% of Colorado people support the right for people to have access. We are losing elections because it’s in the wrong ballot.” He explained that these initiatives have been on ballots during the May voting season when the wrong demographic is showing up to vote, but that the upcoming November election will be very important. 

Next, Jill Lamoureax-Leigh, founder of the first medical marijuana center in Boulder provided her perspective on the regulatory issues as a dispensary owner. She shared how medical marijuana has kept her family together by providing an effective medication for her husband who suffers from a degenerate disease. After five surgeries, her husband refused to take oxycontin and was hesitant to try marijuana. The doctor suggested the medication, explained the proper way to use the drug, and his condition improved tremendously as a result.

Ms. Lamoureaux-Leigh described the difficulties she encountered as a caregiver. Specialized doctors refer patients to her, and even though the practice is legal, “I felt like a drug dealer,” she said because she would be meeting customers in parking lots. Once the business became too large to operate from her home and Ms. Lamoureax-Leigh decided to lease an office; it took eight months to find a landlord willing to rent. She then described the complexities with the HB1284 regulations and working with investors.

Troy Eid, former U.S. Attorney for the District of Colorado and chair of Indian Law Enforcement Commission, spoke next about the federal perspective on medical marijuana. Mr. Eid quickly attacked the argument that medical marijuana should be treated like casinos, noting that marijuana is still illegal. He shared statistics of the increased use in marijuana among high school students since the Colorado law was enacted. Mr. Eid agreed with the other panelists that Congress must do something about this issue. He described the Ogden Memo, Coal Memo and letters that Mr. Vicente described, but noted that President Obama has remained quiet on the subject lately.

The second part of Mr. Eid’s comments stressed that lawyer should not be advising clients on medical marijuana because it is extra-constitutional behavior. “It’s not a good thing to buy into this crap. That somehow it’s not illegal.”             

The final panelist, Matt Cook, a national regulator consultant, worked with legislators to develop Colorado’s medical marijuana laws and discussed the behind-the-scenes drafting of the legislation. Cook believes the federal government will intervene on the issue sooner rather than later. He thinks the Controlled Substances Act will undergo rescheduling as well. Mr. Cook described the licensing process and forms required to meet he rigid guidelines. While he admitted the 30-page application process is extensive, he noted that similar applications are used in the gaming and alcohol industries. Mr. Cook explained the intensive security measures required in dispensaries. The dispensaries must display their license and provide 24-hour web-based surveillance via video cameras. In addition, licensees give up their Fourth Amendment protection and are required to follow strict procedures when handling a dead plant. Mr. Cook informed the audience that, “the seed-to-sale accountability of the plants are the most complex comprehensive regulatory system in this area in the United States.”


[1] J.D. Candidate, 2013, University of Denver Sturm College of Law.

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>