Forthcoming Articles

2012, Volume 89

Preview: Prost v. Anderson and the Enigmatic Savings Clause of 2255: When is a Remedy by Motion "Inadequate or Ineffective?"
Bryan Florendo

Preview: The Federal Arbitration Act, The Preemption Doctrine, and the Impact of AT&T Mobility L.L.C. v. Concepcion 
Kristopher Kleiner

Preview: Thomas v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.: Semantics, Fiduciary Duty, and an Outdated Distinction
Jeremy Liles

Preview: Policing the Police: Protecting Civil Remedies in Cases of Retaliatory Arrest
Randolph A. Robinson II

Preview: Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. Winn: Reconsidering Flast’s Exception to the Rule Against Taxpayer Standing and Establishing the Tax Credit Distinctio
Edward R. Shaoul

Preview: Taking It All Off: Salazar v. Butterball and the Battle over Fair Compensation Under the FLSA’s “Changing Clothes” Provision
Amanda Walck

2011, Volume 88.4

Special Issue: Socioeconomic Diversity and American Legal Education

Foreword: Social Class, Race and Legal Education 
Joyce Sterling & Catherine E. Smith

Class in American Legal Education
Richard H. Sander

Reflections on Class in American Legal Education
Richard Lempert

Reflections on Richard Sander’s Class in American Legal Education
Richard D. Kahlenberg

Class Privilege in Legal Education: A Response to Sander
Deborah C. Malamud

Meeting Across the River: Why Affirmative Action Needs Race & Class Diversity
Deirdre M. Bowen, J.D., Ph.D.

An Ounce of Prevention is Worth a Pound of Cure: Reframing the Debate about Law School Affirmative Action
Daniel Kiel

Class, Classes, and Classic Race-Baiting: What’s in a Definition?
Angela Onwuachi-Willig & Amber Fricke

Race as a Red Herring? The Logical Irrelevance of the Race vs. Class Debate
Arin N. Reeves

Race and Socioeconomic Diversity in American Legal Education: A Response to Richard Sander
Danielle Holley-Walker

Commentary on Professor Richard Sander’s Class in American Legal Education
L. Darnell Weeden

The Visibility of Socioeconomic Status and Class-Based Affirmative Action: A Reply to Professor Sander
Eli Wald

Listening to the Debate on Reforming Law School Admissions Preferences
Richard H. Sander

 

Events & Announcements

Forty Years Since Keyes v. School District No. 1: Equality of Education Opportunity and the Legal Construction of Modern Metropolitan America

February 1, 2013

The Denver University Law Review is excited to announce the topic of its 2013 annual symposium: “Forty Years Since Keyes v. School District No. 1: Equality of Education Opportunity and the Legal Construction of Modern Metropolitan America.” Emanating from Denver, Colorado, Keyes was the first school-desegregation case from “a major city outside of the South” to reach the United States Supreme Court. The symposium will revisit Keyes with key participants from the case and from the court supervision of Denver’s desegregation plan. We will look back at how the city, the metropolitan area, and the state’s public school systems have evolved over the past forty years as well as consider the challenges they face today and in the future. All are welcome, and CLE credit will be available for the various panels, lectures, and workshops.  Please mark your calendar and plan to join us on February 1, 2013, at the University of Denver Sturm College of Law. Click here for more event details.

 


Volume 90 Board of Editors Announced

Denver University Law Review is excited to announce the Volume 90 Board of Editors.  Please join us in congratulating them in this accomplishment and supporting them in continuing the fine tradition of the Denver University Law Review. Please click here to view masthead.

Marijuana at the Crossroads: A Symposium

On January 27, the Denver University Law Review presented our annual symposium. This year we explored the state of medical marijuana laws today, the issues attorneys confront in practice, the constitutional issues, and the ethical issues. For more information, please click here. This event created some buzz with the local media.

Thanks to all our speakers and everyone who worked behind the scenes to help make this a successful event. 

Denver University Law Review Creating a Buzz  

Our most recent issue, Issue 88.4, on Socioeconomic Diversity and American Legal Education is already creating buzz in the legal and education community.

The ABA Journal recently highlighted Richard H. Sander's article "Class in American Legal Education," available here.

In addition, Richard Kahlenberg commented on Prof. Sander's article in The Chronicle of Higher Education blog. Click here to read Prof. Kahlenberg's article on The Chronicle of Higher Education, and here to read Profs. Sander's article and Kahlenberg's reflection. 

« Cause Lawyering as a Tool to Increase Access | Main | The Right of Access, the Right to Counsel »
Friday
Nov252011

Law School Clinics: Education and Access

 

Kira Suyeishi[1]

The Law School Clinics: Education and Access panel featured Julie Waterstone, Director of the Children’s Rights Clinic and Associate Clinical Professor at Southwestern Law School; Patience Crowder, Assistant Professor and creator of the Community Economic Development Clinic at the University of Denver Sturm College of Law; Jeffrey Selbin, Clinical Professor and Faculty Director of the East Bay Community Law Center at UC Berkeley Boalt Hall; and Brad Bernthal, Associate Clinical Professor of Law with the Entrepreneurial Law Clinic and Technology Law & Policy Clinic at the University of Colorado Law School.  Colene Robinson, Associate Clinical Professor of Law at the University of Colorado Law School, moderated the panel.  The panelists each discussed the dichotomy between the two primary objectives of law school clinical programs:  educating students in the practical skills of lawyering while striving to provide high quality legal representation to those who cannot afford traditional representation.  I will discuss Professor Waterstone’s and Professor Crowder’s comments on the panel.

Professor Waterstone established the Children’s Rights Clinic at Southwestern Law.  In this clinic, students represent youth and their families in special education and school discipline cases, primarily by assisting students who are facing school exclusion.  Prior to starting the clinic, Professor Waterstone spent six months surveying the greater Los Angeles area in order to assess the unmet needs of the community and determined that special education and school discipline were areas that would both benefit from clinical representation and would be a positive experiential learning opportunity for students participating in the law school clinic.  In addressing the tension between the dual objectives of educating the law school students participating in the clinic and providing legal representation to the community, Professor Waterstone stated that training was the most important aspect in reaching the two goals in tandem.  Training the law students to effectively interview and counsel clients, while also enabling them to train their clients with the skills to act as pro se litigants allowed students to gain practical skills to further their educational experiences as student attorneys, while also providing tangible legal services to clients in need. For more information on the Children’s Rights Clinic, please click here.

Professor Crowder created the Community Economic Development Clinic, the first transactional clinic at the University of Denver Sturm College of Law.  The clinic assists small business owners with formation of their businesses ranging in services from contract and lease review to counseling clients regarding IRS compliance.  Many of the clinic’s clients are women and minority business owners as well as clients who come from disadvantaged backgrounds.  In discussing the competing objectives of educating the law students and providing legal services to clients in need, Professor Crowder emphasized the importance of explaining the dual goals to potential clients so that they know what to expect before retaining clinical representation.  As the law school’s first, and only, transactional clinic, the Community Economic Development Clinic seeks to provide practical experiential learning opportunities to students who are interested in becoming transactional attorneys.  Professor Crowder challenges the clinical students to examine the clinic in the larger context of clinical programs and social justice by urging them to think about questions such as what it means to represent a for-profit business when we do not normally think of these types of clients as an underserved population.  Professor Crowder stated that while there is the danger of “forcing an artificial distinction,” it is important to encourage students to think about their clients’ place in the community and to examine issues of economic injustice. For more information on the Community Economic Development Clinic, please click here.

 


[1] J.D. Candidate, 2013, University of Denver Sturm College of Law.

References (1)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.
  • Response
    Response: amateurseite
    [...]The online supplement to the Denver University Law Review - Right to Access Symposium - Law School Clinics: Education and Access[...]

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>